Monday, January 18, 2016

Job Market Stats for the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine

Edit: Looks like I goofed on how to calculate UK-inclusive stats when I first posted this. Up is down over there, lecturer is professor and tenure is as dead as it will be in 10 years in the US! Anyway, it should be correct now (but I'd welcome feedback if not).
___________________________________________
It's nearing the end of the tenure-track portion of the annual job market. We might see one or two more positions, but usually from January onward it's just temporary positions - postdocs, VAPs, lecturer positions, etc.

It's been a rough year. My subjective feeling was that there were far more senior hires than usual, and fewer tenure-track spots. In order to see if I was right, I calculated statistics from the past several years of postings on the Academic Wiki page for the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine: http://academicjobs.wikia.com/wiki/History_of_Science,_Technology,_and_Medicine_2015-2016

For anyone not familiar, the Academic Jobs wiki is a user-generated stream of information about the job market. People post jobs, and update when they hear back (requests for info, interviews, campus visits, offers being made, offers being accepted). It's crucial in a market that seems to thrive on opacity, and where rejection letters, if they ever arrive, may be as much as 12 months past when you applied. Since it's user-generated, it's not truly thorough, but it's probably a good starting point at the least.

Here are statistics for the job market since 2010 (TT stands for Tenure-Track). I'm tossing together all specialties and sub-fields:

Jobs in North America
2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
Senior 0 3 5 2 1 4
Open 4 7 3 0 1 2
TT 12 23 33 17 25 13
Non-TT 2 5 6 5 4 1

It might make sense to combine Senior/Open Hire searches, since my subjective impression is those very often go for senior hires:

All Jobs in North America, combining Senior/Open
2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
Senior/Open 4 10 8 2 2 6
TT 12 23 33 17 25 13
Non-TT 2 5 6 5 4 1


Since foreign university systems are pretty different, it's hard to make a direct comparison. Let's make the following approximations:

Fellow = Non-Tenure Track
Lecturer = Tenure-Track Asst. Prof.
Professor = Tenured Prof.

Not a perfect fit, but maybe close enough to see where we are on an international scale:

All Jobs in the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine
2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
Senior 1 5 5 3 3 8
Open 4 7 4 0 1 2
TT 16 33 42 25 36 18
Non-TT 3 5 7 6 4 1





All Jobs in HistSTM, combining Senior/Open
2010-211 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
Senior/Open 5 12 9 3 4 10
TT 16 33 42 25 36 18
Non-TT 3 5 7 6 4 1


Discussion

As you can see, our "recovery" from the depths of the Great Recession has not been sustained. In fact, we're almost as bad off this year as we were in 2010. If anything, it's likely that data is missing from 2010-11, in which case this year might be the worst for which this data exists.

My suspicion about the aberrant number of senior hires seems to be correct insofar as it's a moderate increase in those and a moderate decrease in tenure-track listings, compared to the last few years in which I've been on the market. Interestingly it's still less than in 2011-12, though.

If we want to get generational-warfare-y, here's the annual difference between TT job listings and senior/open hire listings, in North America:

2010-11: 8
2011-12: 14
2012-13: 25
2013-14: 15
2014-15: 23
2015-16: 7

So, it's a really bad time not to have a job. No news there, but it is actually worse than the past few years. It's good news if you're tenured and looking to move around; it's bad news is you're a department running one of these 6 senior/open searches, since there's much better chance of a failed search.

For reference, Harvard's Department of the History of Science alone lists 46 grad students, 8 postdocs, and 9 visiting faculty. Assuming those grad students are evenly split across the average length of 7 years, that's ~14 Harvard folks on the market next year. They alone could fill up every tenure-track job listed this year in North America, and still have a person or two left over. What a world.

In fact, let's run with this:

Overproduction of HistSTM PhDs, underestimated

(Or, Underproduction of HistSTM Jobs, But That's a Tough Nut to Crack)

Here are a few top programs, just grabbing the number of their History of Science/Tech/Med grad students (ignoring postdocs and VAPs) from department websites:

Harvard 46
MIT 36
Princeton 29
U Penn 28
Johns Hopkins 25
Yale 22
Chicago 11
UC Berkeley 7
Total 204
Estimating 7 years for a degree, that's about 30 PhDs in the history of science each year just from these top programs, probably underestimating.

We average about 21 tenure-track jobs, anywhere in North America, each year.

Even if we assume that there are a half-dozen more jobs each year posted than get listed on the Wiki (which is generous), that's still overproducing PhDs (again, just from these top programs)

Then there are the dozens, probably hundreds of grad students doing great work at programs outside of these schools, or perhaps in other STS programs at these schools I'm not counting.

Then there's the army of postdocs, VAPs, adjuncts, and others who already have PhDs and are also competing for each of these jobs each year.

That's grim. 

What can be done? Well, we can continue to discourage prospective students, but universities needs to take some responsibility too. Can you really produce more new PhDs each year than there are new jobs in your entire field, around the world, Harvard? It's certainly true that we can and should be pushing alt-ac careers as legitimate and important, but that seems like a stretch to me.

Specifics / Data

Of course, not all jobs are created equal. I haven't tried to split out into categories of prestige, or R1 vs. SLAC. There are also some funny effects of jobs repeating for a few years, presumably because of failed searches. It might make sense to look at the actual job listings, then. Forgive the sloppy copying of names. Repeated entries are for multiple jobs listed at that university:

2015-16

Senior Open TT Non-TT
Nebraska Cal State East Bay Cal State Channel Islands Carnegie Mellon
NYU MIT Harvard
Purdue Harvard
Yale Mississippi state
Aarhus Mississippi state
Copenhagen Penn
Westminster RIT
York Southern Connecticut
UC Davis
UC Riverside
UC Riverside
Washington Univ. in St. Louis
Waterloo
Cambridge
Freiburg
Korea Advanced Institute of Sci-Tech
Liverpool
Nazarbayev
______________________________________________________________________
2014-15

Senior Open TT Non-TT
RPI UCLA Bucknell ASU
Regensburg Birmingham Oklahoma Norman
Oxford Cal SLO Puget Sound
Harvard UCB
Hopkins
Kansas Medical Centre
MSU
MSU
MSU
Northern Kentucky
Notre Dame
Ohio Univ.
Penn
RIT
Tennessee Tech
Tufts
U Wash Bothel
UC SC
UCB
UCD
UVA
Vanderbilt
VT
Washington St. L.
Wesleyan
Aarhus
Cambridge
Kings College
Leeds
Leeds
Nazarbayev
Swansea
Sydney
Warwick
Yonsei
York
______________________________________________________________________
2013-14

Senior Open TT Non-TT
Harvard ASU Columbia
McMaster Auburn NASA
Freiburg Cal SLO Rhodes
Cornell UCB
Creighton Utah St
Drew Cambridge
Drexel
MIT
Penn
San Diego
Stevens
Toronto
Tulane
UC SB
Wis-Mad
Yale
Bristol
Cambridge
Edinburgh
Exeter
Kent
Korea Advanced Institute Sci-Tech
Oxford
UC London
UC London
______________________________________________________________________
2012-13

Senior Open TT Non-TT
Duke Illinois U-C CSU Fullerton MSU
Illinois U-C MO - Columbia Alabama Cal Tech
MIT NJ Inst. of Tech Amherst Duke
Penn NYU Shanghai Carlton MSU
Wichita State Chicago MSU
Cornell Vanderbilt
Drew Imperial London
Drexel
Emory
ETSU
Farmingdale State
Harvard
McMaster
Montana State
Northern Arizona
Penn
Princeton
Stanford
Stanford
Texas Austin
U Idaho
U Pacific
UNC Wilmington
UNM
Vanderbilt
Vassar
VCU
Winnipeg
Wisc Mad
Wisconsin - Stevens Point
Wright State
Yale
Bristol
Cambridge
Edingburgh
Kent
Kings College
Kings College
Melbourne
Tsinghua
UC London
Universidad del Roasrio-Bogota
______________________________________________________________________
2011-12


Senior Open TT Non-TT
Johns Hopkins Maryland Institute College of Art Drexel ASU
Penn Georgia Gwinett Albany, SUNY Drexel
Wichita State Illinois ASU National Library of Medicine
Sydney Rutgers CUNY - Staten Island Northwestern
Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona Texas, Medical Branch Drexel NY Academy of Medicine
Vanderbilt George Washington
Yale Houston
Johns Hopkins
Kansas
Minnesota
Mississippi State
Mississippi State
New Jersey Institute of Tech
New Mexico - ABQ
Northwestern
Puget Sound
RIT
Stevens Intitute of Tech
Texas Austin
Texas Dallas
Texas Galveston
UC Irvine
Wisconsin-Madison
Cambridge
Gottingen
Hull
Oxford Brookes
Queen Mary, Univ. London
UC London
UC London
UC London
Warwick
Yonsei [cancelled]
______________________________________________________________________
2010-11

Senior Open TT Non-TT
King's College Emory Cornell Ryerson
Harvard Alabama Huntsville Stanford
Johns Hopkins Chicago Manchester
Virginia Tech Dickinson
Harvey Mudd
Illinois Institute of Tech
Minnesota Rochester
Missouri Univ. of Sci-Tech
Penn
Princeton
RIT
St. Louis College of Pharmacy
Cambridge
Glasgow
Imperial College London
Yonsei

2 comments:

  1. Hi there: it's not the case that the UK only advertises senior jobs in this field - it's rather that we tend to use postdoctoral positions effectively as our tenure, so that Lectureships are, roughly speaking, the entry level permanent position. There have been a couple of cases recently of ABD US candidates getting UK Lectureships in HSTM, although that's seen as unusual/exceptional here. For the sake of your stats, you should probably count 'lectureships' in the UK as roughly the same as TT jobs - they're entry-level anyway.
    (declaration of interest: I mod the history pages on the wiki, and am an HSTM person in the UK).

    ReplyDelete
  2. Interesting, thanks for the comment! Obviously I have only partial familiarity with the UK system. Probably it still makes sense to keep UK / non-US stats separate, but I'll try shifting around the all-inclusive stats when I get a little time.

    ReplyDelete